Shopping.com To Test Universal Shopping Cart

Back in February, in a post about Google Payments (later named Checkout) and Unified/Universal Shopping Carts, I wrote:

I was hoping to hear a plan for rolling out the eBay express platform to SDC, allowing a user to add a sweater from Macy’s, hat from Nordstrom, and shoes from Zappos to a unified cart for checkout. I purposely give the example of the apparel category because I think the category begs for innovation on the shopping comparison engines, but unification obviously works for the electronics category - think digital camera and accessories, computers and accessories, ipods and accessories and many other areas (anywhere there is an upsell opportunity).

Turns out I was 8-9 months early with that post.

In a bold move, Shopping.com will begin testing a universal shopping cart feature over the next couple months. The service allows shoppers to add products from multiple merchants to a single Shopping.com cart and purchase those products through Shopping.com. The payment system will be powered by PayPal. Merchants participating in the test will be charged on a revenue share basis as opposed to the standard cost per click model. Shopping.com/PayPal will process the transaction and send the necessary information (name, shipping address, quantity ordered, etc.) to the merchant for order fulfillment. There are two ways merchants can receive this information: via FTP and via the Merchant Account Center . The merchant will then send Shopping.com a status update when the order is processed and Shopping.com will relay an order confirmation to the buyer. Buyers can find out about their order status from their Cart account on Shopping.com. The buyer will receive one order number even if he buys from multiple retailers.

The test isn’t live right now, so don’t go looking.

Positives from the merchant perspective…
-Shopping.com’s universal shopping cart should increase conversion rate (Rob and his team argued that people get confused when they leave SDC and land on a totally different site with a different theme and multi-step checkout process)
-Merchants only pay on a CPA basis thus removing all risk from the marketing channel (merchants should now feel comfortable listing entire product databases)

Negatives from the merchant perspective…
-Ceding customer ownership to Shopping.com (Shopping.com controls all communication with the customer…merchants can’t access a customer’s email address or phone number)
-Merchants lose ability to upsell/cross-sell other products during the buying/checkout process which lowers the average order size

As a merchant, ‘ceding customer ownership to Shopping.com’ is my biggest concern. It remains my biggest concern with Google Checkout. In-house email lists are more valuable than any other marketing channel and Shopping.com could completely take away the ability for a merchant to re-market. The concerns Safa Rashtchy uncovered in talking with merchants about Checkout are now valid for Shopping.com.

BUT this is just a test. It’s way too early to understand merchant (or consumer) adoption…can’t wait to talk to the participating merchants.


Jellyfish :: Blog Archive :: Another Search Engine Dips a Toe into the CPA Waters said

[...]
Another Search Engine Dips a Toe into the CPA Waters

Brian Smith’s post at ComparisonEngines today has some very interes [...]


Lisa said

One of my biggest concerns would be the loss of customer information for email marketing and not getting the customer on our site for upselling. However, this would definitely be more interesting for retailers that sell consumer electronics (although many consumer electronics retailers do try to sell accessory bundles as well…).

I guess if it really brought incremental sales…maybe worth a try. However, I’d definitely have to analyze based on customer lifetime value and the value of that customer information.


Vic Berggren said

Turning my customers over to shopping.com is not something I’m even remotely interested in. Too, and not to bash SDC but I don’t know that I’m all that comfortable with their level of customer service to even take this endeavor on (my own personal experience).

Getting the customers is half of the real story here though. Think about this for a second. SCE’s would easily be positioned to instantly become part of the distribution channel when they own the customer. At some point in this process it will make more sense for an SCE to go direct by collapsing the channel by 1 layer and selling directly to THEIR customer. Guess where that leaves you the merchant folks?


Why You Don’t Want Shopping.com to Have Their Own Shopping Cart » eCommerce Cache :: Varien eCommerce Blog :: A blog focused on the design, marketing, and implementation of online commerce said

[...] r eBay, even going as far as using PayPal for the payment system? Oh ya… Related: ComparisonEngines.com has a great post on th [...]


EarlyMiser said

These sorts of things have been tried before - and flopped before. Not owning the customer is a huge barrier and the percieved benefits to the customer are just that perceieved benefits. Sure customers get confused when going from the shopping site to the actual merchant site but that same customer is going to be tremendously confused by who to go to for customer service when their order is fufilled by 3 different merchants. Amazon is the only company thus far to do something like this with moderate success with their Amazon Marketplace.


Basic Thinking Blog » E-Commerce: der gemeinsame Warenkorb II. said

[...] angebot auch eine einheitliche Warenkorblösung anzubieten. und bezieht sich auf die Bestrebungen von Shopping.com.
Trackback-URL
Geles [...]


ComparisonEngines.com » Blog Archive » When Google Checkout Adoption for Merchants Makes Sense said

[...] h of AdWords clicks plus free credit card processing is a hefty incentive. Related Posts: Shopping.com To Test Universal Shopping Cart - October 6 [...]


You must be logged in to post a comment.


Close
Powered by ShareThis